> On Jan 5, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Erik P. Olsen <epod...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2016-01-05 at 15:01:11 Kern Sibbald wrote: > >> There is always the possibility of a bug in Bacula, but no one has >> reported one. It "sounds" like you are saying that something is a >> bug, but I am not sure. >> >> I based the Bacula algorithm on the ISO definition as it existed in >> 2000, and I never remember seeing anything about a year being more >> than 365 days. This is why I came with week 0. If I missed that or >> the ISO definition has changed, that might be worthwhile reporting. >> However, always take what some web site says is an ISO implementation >> with a grain of salt. It takes a good amount of time to ensure that >> an algorithm is correct. >> >> Best regards, >> Kern > > Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
Keep in mind that wikipedia is a reference, not the ISO itself. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
