On 2016-01-05 at 15:01:11 Kern Sibbald wrote: > There is always the possibility of a bug in Bacula, but no one has > reported one. It "sounds" like you are saying that something is a > bug, but I am not sure. > > I based the Bacula algorithm on the ISO definition as it existed in > 2000, and I never remember seeing anything about a year being more > than 365 days. This is why I came with week 0. If I missed that or > the ISO definition has changed, that might be worthwhile reporting. > However, always take what some web site says is an ISO implementation > with a grain of salt. It takes a good amount of time to ensure that > an algorithm is correct. > > Best regards, > Kern
Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601 -- Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
