> I keep hearing talk of "old community code" which makes it sound like the >Win32 support has become proprietary.
It does sound as if Bacula will eventually become the world's hardest to install, pay-for backup solution. Not that I blame Bacula for going closed source: money is a strong motivator. However, I think without open source Windows clients people won't take the considerable time it takes to learn how to install Bacula, and they will turn to other solutions. Compiling and maintaining the client must take a lot of work, but hasn't the community provided free testing and bug reporting all these years and made Bacula what it is today? That should be worth something. Looks I'm going to be using 5.2.13 for a long time... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
