>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:47:49 +0200, Kern Sibbald said: > > On 04/22/2014 03:30 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>>>>> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:38:13 +0200, Kern Sibbald said: > >> In general yes, it is much more stable, because it is build by > >> Bacula Systems (usually me) with the correct libraries and delivered > >> to paying customers. With other versions you get they may or may > >> not be built with the correct libraries (especially the correct Qt > >> libraries). Yes, it has a few more features because it is a later > >> version. I do not have an exact list of new features though. > >> ... > >> At the moment, we are not planning a new community version because > >> it is too much work for me to maintain two different versions, build > >> them and test them. > > At the risk of sounding rude, why can't you publish a working build script > > that checks for the required libraries, so users can build the source > > reliably? > > During the standard make process the source code does check for the > correct libraries, but often packagers patch the source to turn off the > check or they change the required version to what is on their build machine.
Yes, I understand that packagers might release some junk, but that's no reason to prevent users from building their own if they follow the recommendations. I keep hearing talk of "old community code" which makes it sound like the Win32 support has become proprietary. __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
