I second what Alan says ... I waited a long time too and it was a bit harder to get PostgreSQL work with Bacula (permissions and such all of which are documented in the manual), but I definitely would not go back.
PostgreSQL 9.1 or later is particularly good with Bacula. Best regards, Kern On 04/23/2014 05:35 PM, Alan Brown wrote: > On 21/04/14 15:25, Lloyd Brown wrote: > >> Definitely more than I expected. Although, I have to say, RAM usage on >> this host isn't really much of a concern. At the moment, the mysqld >> process is only using just over 1GB of RAM, and this host has 128G. >> Possibly I need to tune MySQL to keep more of the tables' contents in RAM. > One of the main problems with using mysql at large sizes is the need for > large amounts of tuning. > > I resisted moving to Postgres for a long time. > > I'm still kicking myself that I held off doing so for so long. > > (bonus: It's much faster than MySQL for batch inserts) > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform > Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software > Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready > Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
