On 21/04/14 15:25, Lloyd Brown wrote: > Definitely more than I expected. Although, I have to say, RAM usage on > this host isn't really much of a concern. At the moment, the mysqld > process is only using just over 1GB of RAM, and this host has 128G. > Possibly I need to tune MySQL to keep more of the tables' contents in RAM.
One of the main problems with using mysql at large sizes is the need for large amounts of tuning. I resisted moving to Postgres for a long time. I'm still kicking myself that I held off doing so for so long. (bonus: It's much faster than MySQL for batch inserts) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
