Hello, I am very sorry to learn that the Bareos website has created unpleasant repercussion such as described in the email from Josip included below. For a more complete discussion of what really happened, please read the following:
http://blog.bacula.org/more-bareos-unpleasant-repercusions/ Best regards, Kern On 03/29/2014 01:20 AM, Josip Almasi wrote: > On 03/26/2014 02:07 AM, WebDawg wrote: >> I see now that you are talking about how the code was also copied from >> other sources but at first read it seems like Bacula is going to take >> action against the users of bareos. > Seems some of my code got involved there. > I was quite unpleasantly surprised to learn that the hardlink > performance patch I wrote is the first argument on bareos list of 'why > fork'. > > Let me make it clear: > I contributed to Bacula project. > I do not support the fork. > > Not that it matters, it's open source and anyone is free to do with it > whatever. > But this fork mess with laywers and everything... > The exact opposite of open source. > > Regards... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
