On 03/26/2014 02:07 AM, WebDawg wrote: > I see now that you are talking about how the code was also copied from > other sources but at first read it seems like Bacula is going to take > action against the users of bareos.
Seems some of my code got involved there. I was quite unpleasantly surprised to learn that the hardlink performance patch I wrote is the first argument on bareos list of 'why fork'. Let me make it clear: I contributed to Bacula project. I do not support the fork. Not that it matters, it's open source and anyone is free to do with it whatever. But this fork mess with laywers and everything... The exact opposite of open source. Regards... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
