On 03/03/2014 04:39 AM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: > The only reason to use disk vchanger instead of Bacula build in > functionality are hard disks stored offline like tapes. If it is not your > case just avoid using it.
Bacula can't write "volume" files into more than one directory. If you can concatenate your storage into a single filesystem (using lvm, raid, ???fs) then Bacula's built-in functionality is fine. The reasons for not doing that and keeping your drives separate instead include, but are not limited to being able to pull one out and store it offline. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
