On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:56:42PM -0800, bradbpw wrote: > More info. I ran a iperf test, it seems oddly high, there is no way these > can be the actual transfer rates, right? > > > brad@home-server:~$ iperf -c 63.227.74.80 -p 9102 -f Kbytes -i 1 -t 10
Even more info is needed... db backend used, Number of files in backup job, clientfilesystem type & memory config, bacula director hardware etc. Cheers, Uwe -- NIONEX --- Ein Unternehmen der Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
