Thanks Patrick, and to others. For now I'll play it safe and do the cleanings manually. Although changing the timeout sounds like a good future option.
-M > From: Jummo <jum...@yahoo.de> > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] using auto-clean on an autochanger > To: Michael Stauffer <mgsta...@gmail.com> > Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1307021059090.4503@zrtncp72.ybpny> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > Hi Michael, > > Against my statement in [1] I have seen several timeouts with failed jobs. > I have changed my tape library configuration to only notify me, if a > cleaning requests raised by a tape drive. All jobs will still run > (hopefully with correct data on tape, because the drive is still able to > write correct data, but will have problems in the near future. Can someone > confirm this?). Then I will manually start the cleaning. > > As mention by Arno Lehmann in [2], you could increase the timeout Bacula > will wait for the storage. > > Best Regards, > Patrick > > [1] http://adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2013-01/msg00228.html > [2] http://adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2008-12/msg00451.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
