On Tue, March 20, 2012 9:11 am, Alan Brown wrote: > On 20/03/12 01:31, Dan Langille wrote: >> I just saw this job move multiple volumes from the scratch pool into >> another pool. >> >> That seems very odd. Bacula 5.0.3 oh my.. I should upgrade. > > I've been seeing it for a while - Kern mailed a couple of weeks ago to > say he thinks he knows what's causing it but there's no fix yet.
Thank you Mr Brown. Good to hear from you. > >> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU233" from >> 'Scratch' pool. >> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU234" from >> 'Scratch' pool. >> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU235" from >> 'Scratch' pool. >> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU236" from >> 'Scratch' pool. >> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU237" from >> 'Scratch' pool. >> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU238" from >> 'Scratch' pool. >> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: Using Volume "ETU239" from >> 'Scratch' pool. >> 20-Mar 01:24 bacula-dir JobId 90684: There are no more Jobs associated >> with Volume "ETU033". Marking it purged. > > Were these all brand new tapes? Me? No, I rarely have those. I'm sure these are old, old tapes. But in good condition. I monitor the error rates and retire those with crap results. -- Dan Langille -- http://langille.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
