> It is possible that the documentation is not as detailed or explicit > as it > could be, but the two different FileSets you wrote are totally > different, and > the parser works perfectly fine otherwise it would have reported an > error. > > What is more likely is that the way two different Options blocks are > interpreted (or executed) is non-trivial and different from what you > understand.
First of all, to my own defence, this configuration was something I took over after being absent from work a few weeks after an accident. We had a consultant do the initial installation, and I thought it was ok. Secondly, after looking at the code, it looks like there is some built-in support for allowing multiple option blocks. A parameter 'pass' is passed to the functions, and the options struct is only initialised if the value of 'pass' is one. However - I don't see this variable being incremented, but then, I've only spent an hour or so looking into the code, and I sometimes find object-oriented C a bit hard to follow. Last, I would think the -t argument to bacula-dir should have reported this issue Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 r...@karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
