On Sunday 13 February 2011 13.48:34 Frank Sweetser wrote: > On 2/13/2011 6:00 AM, rst wrote: > > Thank you for your prompt reply. I'll try to answer both Kern and > > Randy in this message. > > One more point I wanted to throw out there - while Kern and the rest of the > Bacula developers do an excellent job of making sure Bacula works on a wide > range of configurations, you don't have to take their word for it. > Instead, you can set up and run the regression suite: > > http://bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/developers/developers/Bacula_Regression_ >Testing.html > > This way you can put Bacula through its paces on your own exact > configuration and verify its functionality before trying to go live. In > addition, if you do encounter any problems, the results will be visible to > on the regression upload site, helping troubleshooting.
Thanks for mentioning this Frank. When we are in the final phases of a release (generally the last month) as we are currently, we look at all the results of the regression tests. If we find something wrong, we can often change the debug level or other parameter of a test and get the information we need to solve problems without involving the testers ... Regards, Kern ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
