Rory Campbell-Lange schrieb: > On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm still using bacula 3.0.3 on debian lenny (amd64). In the next > > weeks I wanted to move on to 5.0.x. But due to the freeze of the next > > debian stable release there will be no 5.0.3 in debian for some time. > > 5.0.3 seems to have a lot of importent bug fixes, so I'd like to skip > > 5.0.2 which is available in lenny-backports right now. > > > > Does anyone use an alternative bacula repository for debian lenny? > > We have been using the backports 5.0.2-1 on Stable for a couple of > months. It works well. > > http://packages.debian.org/lenny-backports/bacula > http://wiki.debian.org/Backports#Findingbackports
Thanks, I know this version from backports, and if there is no other deb available, I'll give it a try. >From http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=news (and from the mails I received from the bacula-bugs list) I had the feeling that 5.0.3 fixed some important issues. Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
