On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 00:46:06 -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > > It looks like you are running a 64-bit bacula-sd, so the libraries > > should be in /usr/lib64. > > > > The files you found are in /usr/lib, which are normally 32-bit. > > Either you have the 32-bit libraries installed by accident or the > > 64-bit libraries are installed in the wrong place (broken rpm?).
> Indeed, I'm using CentOS 5.5 amd64. I was not doing the installation > with RPM packages, but compile the source code obtained at the > official site of Bacula. On sunday, doing tests comparing with the > installation done with packages RPM, I realized that the difference > was in which the libraries were in /usr/lib64. > > Doing again the configuration using this time the --libdir=/usr/lib64 > parameter, the problem was not reproduced. What it is strange to me is > that in an installation of Debian Lenny amd64, I didn't do the > configuration using --libdir=/usr/lib64 and in spite of putting the > libraries in /usr/lib, I did not have the problem occurred in CentOS. I already found the cause: # ll /usr/lib lib/ lib32/ lib64/ # ll -d /usr/lib drwxr-xr-x 41 root root 20480 ago 8 01:56 /usr/lib # ll -d /usr/lib32 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 abr 11 2009 /usr/lib32 -> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib # ll -d /usr/lib64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 abr 11 2009 /usr/lib64 -> lib It's a smart move :-) Regards, Daniel -- Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Lenny - Linux user #188.598
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
