On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Bill Arlofski <waa-bac...@revpol.com> wrote: > On 07/19/10 15:26, John Drescher wrote: > >>> JJ wrote: >>> That worked! It So I basically need to wipe it and then readd to the bacula >>> by issuing 'label barcodes'? >> >> Yes. >> >>> And the problem was that it was corrupt? >>> >> >> The problem is that volume did not contain a valid volume label. It >> appears that for some reason the labeling did not work when you first >> added the volume. I am not sure of the cause of that. >> >> John > > > John, it is possible that this was caused because he was initially using the > rewinding tape device /dev/st0 instead of the non-rewinding device /dev/nst0? > You had cause this configuration issue earlier in the thread. > The reason why I did not think it was caused by that on the tape KL0339 is because the tape was not used after the label operation. The last written date was 000-00-00 00:00:00 and only a single block was written to that tape.
John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
