On 21/06/10 10:56, Lukas Kolbe wrote: > > For comparison, I dd'ed a volume to /dev/null while the copy job was > running: > [r...@shepherd ~]# dd if=/var/bacula/dp/fs1/Vol0070 of=/dev/null bs=1M > 9175040000 bytes (9.2 GB) copied, 12.0225 seconds, 763 MB/s > > But dd'ing it to another file reveals a problem with the storage > subsystem I believe: > > [r...@shepherd ~]# dd if=/var/bacula/dp/fs1/Vol0070 of=/var/bacula/dp/fs2/xxx > bs=1M > 849346560 bytes (849 MB) copied, 32.665 seconds, 26.0 MB/s > >
Try separate raid arrays. FWIW I have 51245s here and their performance is _much_ better than that. Only the 6 disk raid6 array gets close to that and it's primarily spindle/headseek limited. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
