Any Idea? What I should check
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Il Neofita <asteriskm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for all the replies > The bottleneck is the network or at lest something in the network > and yes I have an autoloader LTO4 > > If I use NC with a file of 10M I need 8 seconds to transfer > If I use scp I need around 2 seconds > > The same file without compression > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:10 AM, John Drescher <dresche...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Yes I am using a tape but should not be the tape >>> 07-Apr 00:36 angel-sd JobId 1443: Despooling elapsed time = 00:02:34, >>> Transfer rate = 75.16 M bytes/second >>> >>> >>> this is with a full backup >>> >>> FD Files Written: 2,878,988 >>> SD Files Written: 2,878,988 >>> FD Bytes Written: 248,635,057,283 (248.6 GB) >>> SD Bytes Written: 249,102,272,590 (249.1 GB) >>> Rate: 18745.1 KB/s >>> >>> On my mind I was hoping something around 30KB/s >>> >> You mean 30MB/s. >> >> I get 20 to 35MB/s for full backups with LTO2 from a raid5 array to a >> LTO2 autochanger that is not on the same machine as the raid. >> >> It looks like you have an LTO3 changer by the 75MB/s since that is a >> little low for LTO4 however you named the drive LTO4Driver so I assume >> its LTO4. I would expect despools of 100MB/s to 120MB/s for LTO4. >> >> I would first look to optimize your filesystem performance as this >> appears to be where the problem is. Is your spooling drive the same as >> your source data drive? That would kill performance. >> >> John >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
