On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Paul Binkley <paul.bink...@ois.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I have a backup scheme that has been working well, with 1 issue. We write to > a 4.5 TB RAID pack for 30 days, then cycle it as offsite backup, replacing > it with an identical array. > > Now obviously each RAID pack has a different set of volumes, so when I > switch them, the first job can't seem to figure out which volume to use and > it marks the one it expects as Error in the catalog. I have to force it to > use a Volume on the new RAID and then it seems to work fine until I rotate > it again. I am concerned that this one Volume is getting marked as > erroneous, and would also like this to be as "hands-off" as possible. Has > anyone done this sort of thing before, and did you experience similar > issues? > > I may be missing something fundamental and your input is appreciated. > > SD and Director are both running 3.0.3 on separate CentOS 5.3 machines. >
You probably should use separate pools for each raid set. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
