---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: John Drescher <dresche...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:08 AM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] OT: More about concurrent jobs... To: "Jose E. Molina" <jmol...@brujula.es>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Jose E. Molina<jmol...@brujula.es> wrote: > John Drescher escribió: >> You do not want concurrent jobs on your LTO3 but you do with your >> disk? I would have it the other way since disk is generally slower >> than tape. Not using compression with the disk? >> >> >> BTW, I do not know the answer to your real question. I have my disk >> storage on a different machine than my 2 drive autochager. >> >> John > > Hi John, thanks for the reply, do you do backups at the same time in > both of your autochangers? If so, I guess I'd need 2 storage daemons in > the same machine to make concurrent backups to different devices. > > As for the LTO3, i'll possibly go for concurrent backups "everywhere", > that'll be easier than having 2 storage daemons on the same machine. I > didn't do it before because I wanted to keep straight easily recoverable > tapes, instead of having interleaved data on them. > Its a 2 drive autochanger and I have only 1 storage daemon. I achieve concurrency on each drive and I also use both drives at the same time. John -- John M. Drescher ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
