On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 12:44:17PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > 07.05.2009 12:20, Mike Ruskai wrote: > > On 05/07/2009 05:38, Graham Keeling wrote: > >> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 05:18:45AM -0400, Mike Ruskai wrote: > >> > >>> With Bacula 2.4.4, adding an exclusion to a file set causes an > >>> incremental backup to be promoted to full. > >>> > >>> Is this kind of thing fixed in 3.x? > >>> > >> Do you know about the 'Ignore FileSet Changes' option? > >> > >> > >> > > I do now, thanks. > > > > Of course, I don't know if it actually works. > > It does - at least that's my experience. > > > After cancelling the > > superfluous full backup and adding that directive, Bacula still insists > > on doing a full backup. > > That's because the change to "Ignore ..." is considered a file set > change, that takes place *before* the setting becomes valid.
It seems to me that, with the 'accurate' backup feature, 'Ignore FileSet Changes' becomes redundant. Is it true to say that? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
