On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 05:02:48AM -0700, Kevin Keane wrote: > Jason Dixon wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:54:01PM -0400, John Lockard wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:11:55PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote: > >> > >>>> Running Jobs: > >>>> JobId Level Name Status > >>>> ====================================================================== > >>>> 11239 Increme Unix_crank-va-4.2009-03-20_15.39.55 is running > >>>> 11240 Increme Unix_puffer-va-3.2009-03-20_15.39.56 is waiting on max > >>>> Storage jobs > >>>> 11241 Increme Unix_puffer-va-4.2009-03-20_15.39.57 is waiting on max > >>>> Storage jobs > >>>> 11242 Full DatabaseArchives_crank-va-3.2009-03-20_15.40.59 is > >>>> waiting for higher priority jobs to finish > >>>> ==== > >>>> > >>> Ok, it looks like these ran correctly after all. I'm a bit perplexed > >>> why the Director reports 11242 as being lower priority, but at least it > >>> worked as designed. Extracted from llist jobs: > >>> > >> From the run-times, the job order was 11239, 11242, 11240, 11241. > >> This would make sense, it just listed 11242 last, it was waiting > >> for 11239 to finish, thus the "waiting for higher priority jobs" > >> message. > > > > That's a misleading message. Job 11239 had a Priority of 20. Job 11242 > > had a Priority of 10. I think the phrase "waiting for running jobs to > > finish" would be more appropriate. > > > What's the priority of jobs 11240 and 11241? My guess is that 11242 is > actually waiting for those two, rather than for 11239. They, in turn, > are waiting for 11239 due to a Max Concurrent Job.
11239-11241 are Priority = 20. 11242 is Priority = 10. > "Waiting for running job to finish" would not be a good message, because > you would want to know *why* it is waiting. You see that 11240 and 11241 > are also waiting for a running job to finish, just for a different reason. It would be the *correct* message for 11242's state. Because it is NOT waiting for higher priority jobs to finish. Why does it say that, when this is clearly not the case? -- Jason Dixon OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. jdi...@omniti.com 443.325.1357 x.241 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
