On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:54:01PM -0400, John Lockard wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:11:55PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote: > > > > > > Running Jobs: > > > JobId Level Name Status > > > ====================================================================== > > > 11239 Increme Unix_crank-va-4.2009-03-20_15.39.55 is running > > > 11240 Increme Unix_puffer-va-3.2009-03-20_15.39.56 is waiting on max > > > Storage jobs > > > 11241 Increme Unix_puffer-va-4.2009-03-20_15.39.57 is waiting on max > > > Storage jobs > > > 11242 Full DatabaseArchives_crank-va-3.2009-03-20_15.40.59 is > > > waiting for higher priority jobs to finish > > > ==== > > > > Ok, it looks like these ran correctly after all. I'm a bit perplexed > > why the Director reports 11242 as being lower priority, but at least it > > worked as designed. Extracted from llist jobs: > > From the run-times, the job order was 11239, 11242, 11240, 11241. > This would make sense, it just listed 11242 last, it was waiting > for 11239 to finish, thus the "waiting for higher priority jobs" > message.
That's a misleading message. Job 11239 had a Priority of 20. Job 11242 had a Priority of 10. I think the phrase "waiting for running jobs to finish" would be more appropriate. Thanks, -- Jason Dixon OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. jdi...@omniti.com 443.325.1357 x.241 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
