On Nov 6, 2008, at 3:39 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2008, at 7:12 AM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> Here is how I do different IP for the same SD. In my case, remote
> clients
> access the SD via the gateway (public IP address which is forwarded
> from my gateway to the SD) and local clients access the local IP
> address
> (in the 192.168. block).
>
> I have slightly altered this config from my actual, but it should
> illustrate how
> to do this.
>
> From bacula-dir.conf
>
> Storage {
> Name = DLTRemoteTLS
> Address = storage1.example.org
> SDPort = 9103
> Device = DLT
> Media Type = DLT
> }
>
> # Definition of DLT tape storage device
> Storage {
> Name = DLT
> Address = bacula.example.org
> SDPort = 9103
>
> Device = DLT
> Media Type = DLT
> }
>
> That's it. Note that both Storage resources refer to the same Device.
> Both Storage resources have different Address values. Use FQDN
> and point each to different IP addresses.
>
> In my case, bacula.example.org points to 192.168.1.12 and
> DLTRemoteTLD refers to storage1.example.org, which is a public IP
> address.
>
> Then in bacula-sd.conf, I define the DLT device.
>
> Device {
> Name = DLT
> Description = QUANTUM DLT7000 1624
> Media Type = DLT
> Archive Device = /dev/nsa0
> }
>
> Nothing special. But it's clever. Someone else showed me how to do
> it.
>
> Does that give you something to think about?
>
> Sure it does: docs needs updating!
>
> In what way? I already stated this was documented. Here. I found it
> for you:
>
> http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Dealing_with_Firewalls.html
>
> I just read it... it won't work, because I have all the servers en
> the same network. The best bet is to "play around" with *local*
> name resolution (ie, /etc/hosts or lmhosts), which can prove to be
> annoying.
Sure it will. Use different hostnames for the different IP addresses.
The concept, two SD entries pointing at the same SD, is what you want.
> Also, according to the doc you just gave, it says that using two
> different Storage resources, no longer works:
>
> "The following discussion was originally written by Jesse Guardiani
> because he has 'internal' and 'external' requiring the Director and
> the Client to use different IP addresses. His original solution was
> to define two different Storage resources in the Director's conf
> file each pointing to the same Storage daemon but with different IP
> addresses. In Bacula 1.38.x this no longer works, because Bacula
> makes a one-to-one association between a Storage daemon resource and
> a Device (such as an Autochanger). As a consequence, I have modified
> his original text to a method that I believe will work, but is as of
> yet untested (KES - July 2006)."
>
> Duh....
Double Duh.
Or do you mean Doh!
What I posted you from my configuration works. I promise you it
does. I use it every day.
> The thing is: can you run two backup jobs at the same time, one on
> each storage address? (I think there should be no problem).
>
> I'm sure you can. It is merely a concurrent job. Why ask when
> you can try? :)
>
> Because it is easier? :) It was almost midnight by the time I wrote
> that.
Something odd about your emails... The quoting seems wrong.
--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
