Justin Maness wrote: > To Who It May Concern, > > I've recently hit a problem that I thought shouldn't be happening. I > have two autochangers with media existing in two common pools. At HQ > our directory is trying to issue load commands to our library to load > tapes, tapes which only exist offsite in the other, identical, library. > The output error is very weird when our library is asked to load a > tape that isn't there. Now, I don't _see_ a facility in which it knows > where the tapes are beyond that they are 'inchanger.' I hope I am > missing something rather simple because I've contemplated creating > independent pools at each location to work around this problem, but I do > not particularly want to micromanage twice the amount of pools. per > autochanger. If anyone has setup anything similar or might know > something about this behaviour I would be grateful to hear it.
I've had similar concerns, how to tell Bacula that a tape is "beyond reach" without deleting it from the database. For me it is the Archived tapes. If I by any chance should need them, then it would be nice not to be forced to bscan them before, but in all other circumstances, they should be regarded as "gone". -- Jesper ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
