Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 08.01.2008 17:34, John Drescher wrote:
>   
>> On Jan 8, 2008 11:21 AM, Mike Seda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>     
>>> all,
>>> i am frustrated beyond belief.
>>>
>>> i recently spent $8K for a second tape drive for my library.
>>>
>>> all i want is for two bacula backup jobs (one for each tape drive) to
>>> run concurrently. i upgraded the backup server to 2.2.7 (to take
>>> advantage of improved code for handling multiple drives). the clients
>>> are still running 2.0.x.
>>>
>>> i have looked at *so* many postings on concurrent jobs, and have tried
>>> multiple configuration changes but to no avail. please tell me that
>>> there is a way to make two concurrent backup jobs work. is there anyway
>>> to put an end to my suffering other than buying a gun? :-P
>>>       
>
> Sure...
>
>   
>>> My server setup is:
>>> Bacula 2.2.7
>>> RHEL 4 AS
>>> Quantum PX502 (FC, 2 HP LTO-3 Drives)
>>>
>>> i can send my *.conf files if needed.
>>>       
>
> Probably not needed.
>
>   
>>> mike
>>>
>>>       
>> First advice:
>> Put the two jobs you want to run concurrently on different tape drives
>> in different pools.
>>     
>
> Also, read the manual chapter on configuring the DIR, especially the 
> Job section, and even more especially this part:
>
> Prefer Mounted Volumes = <yes|no>
>   
i already have "Prefer Mounted Volumes = no" set in bacula-dir.conf
>      If the Prefer Mounted Volumes directive is set to yes (default 
> yes), the Storage daemon is requested to select either an Autochanger 
> or a drive with a valid Volume already mounted in preference to a 
> drive that is not ready. This means that all jobs will attempt to 
> append to the same Volume (providing the Volume is appropriate -- 
> right Pool, ... for that job). If no drive with a suitable Volume is 
> available, it will select the first available drive. Note, any Volume 
> that has been requested to be mounted, will be considered valid as a 
> mounted volume by another job. This if multiple jobs start at the same 
> time and they all prefer mounted volumes, the first job will request 
> the mount, and the other jobs will use the same volume.
>
>      If the directive is set to no, the Storage daemon will prefer 
> finding an unused drive, otherwise, each job started will append to 
> the same Volume (assuming the Pool is the same for all jobs). Setting 
> Prefer Mounted Volumes to no can be useful for those sites with 
> multiple drive autochangers that prefer to maximize backup throughput 
> at the expense of using additional drives and Volumes. This means that 
> the job will prefer to use an unused drive rather than use a drive 
> that is already in use.
>
> Of course, you do this in addition to enabling basic Job Concurrency...
>
> Arno
>
>   
>> John
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
>> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
>> just about anything Open Source.
>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bacula-users mailing list
>> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>>
>>     
>
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to