> I just want to stress a point that John mentioned - the catalog data for a
> given volume is never absolutely *required* to recover data from a volume.  It
> is just a huge convenience factor.   When the worst case scenario happens,
> though, and all you have to rebuild your infrastructure is a box full of tapes
> and a corporate credit card, Bacula will let you get all of your data back
> with a combination of bls, bextract, and bscan.  It may be slower, but it'll 
> work.
>
Good point and this is a very good feature of bacula being that with
these tools you should be able to extract data from earlier versions
of bacula without the need of a database or to install the whole
bacula package. This is one big reason why the tape format has
remained constant for a long time (since bacula 1.27).

John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to