Alejandro Alfonso schrieb: > > only a suggestion, as i've never used a scenario like yours: how are the > disk partitioned and mounted? > > Maybe, using the same device for "read to spool" and "send spool to > LTO", read job is done twice. Then, spoolled attrs must be send to database
I don't think that this is his problem, because spooling and despooling does not happen at the same time. > And... look your report: > > Using tar: > transfer rate near of 45Gb/hour, what is very good (+ or - 13.5M/s) This is writing to tape. > Using bacula: > Job write elapsed time = 00:55:25, Transfer rate = 14.57 M bytes/second This is writing to disk. > It seems that disk performance is better in bacula! That's what I would expect too. But doesn't help him why bacula is writing to tape only with 6 MB/s instread of 13 MB/s with tar. The overall time for a single backup job with spooling will always be longer than without. But writing to tape from the spool file should be at least as fast as with tar. Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
