Hello!
only a suggestion, as i've never used a scenario like yours: how are the
disk partitioned and mounted?
Maybe, using the same device for "read to spool" and "send spool to
LTO", read job is done twice. Then, spoolled attrs must be send to database
And... look your report:
Using tar:
transfer rate near of 45Gb/hour, what is very good (+ or - 13.5M/s)
Using bacula:
Job write elapsed time = 00:55:25, Transfer rate = 14.57 M bytes/second
It seems that disk performance is better in bacula!
Hope it helps
Best regards!
> I have a dedicated backup server using bacula with disk and LTO-1 storages.
> When I was using tar/star unix commands to record the tape I was
> getting a transfer rate near of 45Gb/hour, what is
> very good (+ or - 13.5M/s).
>
> I'm using bacula 2.2.6 with MySQL 5.0.41 and recording data from the
> same server. (bacula-fd, bacula-sd, bacula-dir, mysql and all backuped
> data is in same server).
>
> Check this lines:
> 21-Nov 03:25 bloo-sd JobId 688: Job write elapsed time = 00:55:25,
> Transfer rate = 14.57 M bytes/second
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Alejandro Alfonso Fernandez
Responsable Área Corporativa * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.telecyl.com/
P
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
