>>>>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:03:43 -0400, Dan Langille said: > Priority: normal > Content-description: Mail message body > > On 24 Aug 2007 at 21:35, Martin Simmons wrote: > > > >>>>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:21:28 -0400, Steve Campbell said: > > > > > > I still have quite a few servers running the 2.4 kernel. All of these > > > are Red Hat clone machines. I do not feel comfortable removing or > > > renaming the library, so I have a few questions.I am just getting > > > started with Bacula, BTW. > > > > > > What module uses this that causes the problem? Is it safe to leave the > > > library in tact on clients? In other words, Is it the director, storage > > > director, file director, or some combination of them that requires this > > > to be eliminated? > > > > All the Bacula daemons are affected by the tls bugs. They will not run > > reliably with the tls library in memory, but it is safe to leave the library > > on disk. > > What TLS bugs are you referring to here? It sounds like I've missed > an advisory or notice.
Condition variables don't work correctly in some cases, leading to pthread_cond_wait hanging forever. Sorry, I don't know the bug numbers, but it took several attempts to before NPTL had fully working condition variables and unfortunately Red Hat released a broken version in the /lib/tls directory. __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
