On 24 Aug 2007 at 21:35, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:21:28 -0400, Steve Campbell said: > > > > I still have quite a few servers running the 2.4 kernel. All of these > > are Red Hat clone machines. I do not feel comfortable removing or > > renaming the library, so I have a few questions.I am just getting > > started with Bacula, BTW. > > > > What module uses this that causes the problem? Is it safe to leave the > > library in tact on clients? In other words, Is it the director, storage > > director, file director, or some combination of them that requires this > > to be eliminated? > > All the Bacula daemons are affected by the tls bugs. They will not run > reliably with the tls library in memory, but it is safe to leave the library > on disk.
What TLS bugs are you referring to here? It sounds like I've missed an advisory or notice. -- Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/ Available for hire: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
