On Friday 08 June 2007 03:10, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
<snip>
>
> I would disagree with that. As far as I know, Use Volume Once has been
> removed for some time. 

No I could still set it to yes in this version.

> However, the replacement (Maximum Volume Jobs = 
> 1) I use on my system to cause volumes to be marked used after one use.
>
> However, this does not affect recycling in my situation.
>
> I would suggest the original poster may have forgotten to update volumes
>  (having created the volume before the current pool directives were in
> place).
>
> Chantal, I'd want to see at a minimum an llist on the volume in
> question, just to verify that at the very least the parameters have made
> it to the volume in the first place.
>
here it is:
          MediaId: 31
       VolumeName: DefaultVolume-0014
             Slot: 0
           PoolId: 1
        MediaType: DDS
     FirstWritten: 2007-06-08 07:26:01
      LastWritten: 2007-06-08 07:26:01
        LabelDate: 2007-06-08 07:26:01
          VolJobs: 0
         VolFiles: 0
        VolBlocks: 0
        VolMounts: 7
         VolBytes: 1
        VolErrors: 0
        VolWrites: 156,381
 VolCapacityBytes: 0
        VolStatus: Append
          Recycle: 1
     VolRetention: 7,200
   VolUseDuration: 0
       MaxVolJobs: 1
      MaxVolFiles: 0
      MaxVolBytes: 0
        InChanger: 1
          EndFile: 4
         EndBlock: 2,170
         VolParts: 0
        LabelType: 0
        StorageId: 2

status is append at the moment because a backup is running

> In addition: keep in mind that the volume may very well not show
> recycled right after the retention time is up. There are some actions
> that will cause the volume recycling algorithm to be run through -- one
> would be attempting a backup against the volume, and I believe 'status
> dir' might be another. Not sure of specifics. Bacula does not, however,
> throw away the contents of the volume right away on its own -- it
> attempts to keep the data as long as possible.

Any idea how long this takes? Approximately?

I am testing Arno's suggestion now, to use "Maximum Volume 
Jobs = 1".  I'll let you know what happens.

This morning I noticed another problem, the backup was running for an hour and 
then I got this message:

08-Jun 02:05 Server-sd: BackupAll.2007-06-08_01.00.00 Error: block.c:538 Write 
error at 4:2171 on device "tape" (/dev/nst0). ERR=Input/output error.
08-Jun 02:06 Server-sd: BackupAll.2007-06-08_01.00.00 Error: Error writing 
final EOF to tape. This Volume may not be readable.
dev.c:1542 ioctl MTWEOF error on "tape" (/dev/nst0). ERR=Input/output error.
08-Jun 02:06 Server-sd: End of medium on Volume "DefaultVolume-0014" 
Bytes=4,139,734,897 Blocks=64,170 at 08-Jun-2007 02:06.

then bacula requested another tape, what does this mean? Something wrong with 
the tape? it is impossible that the tape is full because it's 12G and I 
backup 4G, and it was definitely not appending the data.


Chantal



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to