Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > What's the best way to do this? > > I thought of defining two storage pools and running the job twice (once > on each one), but this ain't that perfect: they are going to be slightly > different copies, and they both will count as base for subsequnt > differential/incremental backups. > It seems to me that if the tapes are slightly different that should not matter since the offsite tapes are only going to be needed if a disaster strikes. I believe that you want two separate jobs. The offsite job will just do a full backup and that is all. It should have its own pool of tapes. The onsite job will do a full, differiential, and incrementals which are set up with the schedule command. If you use separate pools for these, you would specifiy the pool on the schedule line. Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Getting-two-copies-of-tape-backup-tf3505221.html#a9912707 Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
