Hi, On 3/10/2007 1:38 PM, Alexander Marx wrote: > Hi, > I searched for two days and didn't find a solution. Maybe you could give me a > solution. > > OS: > Kubuntu 6.10, bacula 2.0.3 from sf.net, compiled with all options, backup > works well. > > Storage: > NFS share mounted over gbit network > > Backup works relative fine (20GB/hour) > > CLIENT: > Windows 2003 standardserver with bacula2.0.3 client installed(all options) > > > > PROBLEM: > SPEED. When i try to restore a little job (1,4MB) it takes about 5 Min to > complete. The win bacula-client tells me something about a transferrate of > 6,345 Byte/s ???
... which is really not very impressive... > Backup works fine with 4-6MB/sec but the restore is very slow (unusable). > I have another backupjob, which is over 16GB large. When i should restore > this > job, it would take weeks! > > I tried to restore with wx-console, bconsole and bweb/brestore.pl. All > options > the same result: > SLOW,SLOW,SLOW! Not exactly astonishing as these are only the means to transport your input to the DIR. They don't do any real work. > Please help. What am i missing? The clients are only installed without > changes > to any OS-options. > > The Windows2003 standardserver are used as terminalservers which should not > matter. I don't really know much about windows performance tuning. But you could check if there's an unusual high CPU usage during restores. Also, there might be network problems. If possible, try another NIC in one the servers, it might help more than any reasonable person would expect :-) > HARDWARE: > 1 KUBUNTU6.10 with bacula (Director,SD,FD) and a nfs mounted share from a NAS > Server (Open-E). How fast does the NAS server work when reading a volume file? Try 'dd if=/path/to/a/volume bs=64512 of =/dev/null' and caculate your read transfer rate. More sophisticated file system benchmarks do exist, too. > 5 Windows 2003 Server standard How fast can you write to these over the network? Try netio or other network throughput measuring tools. > All servers have 1000mbit nics and are connected to a gbit switch. Apart from the above suggestions, you should try to elimintate variables: - Have you tried to set up a device to store locally, on the Bacula server, to see if restores from it do perform better? - Have you tried restoring not to the original client, but to the Bacula server itself? Arno > thanx in advance > > > Alex > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- IT-Service Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arno Lehmann http://www.its-lehmann.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
