I'm just in the process of setting up bacula and debating postgres
vs mysql (I've used both, but have more experience with the latter).

I see that the current online users' manual mentions that one advantage
of using Postgres is support for transactions and stored procedures.

MySQL also has support for these, albiet only in more recent versions
with the appropriate table types (innodb).

If a recent mysql that supports transactions is used, does bacula take
advantage of it?  If not, then what are the potential side effects?
Does using mysql make it more probable that the DB can get into an
inconsistent state, or is the lack of db transaction support mitigated
by other factors?

Also, has anyone obtained empirical data on how changing the mysql
table types to innodb affects bacula performance?

Devin
-- 
Dimensions will always be specified in the least usable term.  Velocity,
for example, will be expressed in furlongs per fortnight.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to