On Thursday 04 January 2007 19:53, Dan Trainor wrote: > Hi, all - > > Now, Kern, I noticed that you're noted as the RPM package maintainer for > the 1.38 series - should the same be assumed about the 2.0 series, as > well?
Well, I may be "listed" as the maintainer, but Scott Barninger is the guy who does the work. > > I guess what I'm getting at is, I'm sure there are a few people who are > plenty eager to find a nice SRPM for the 2.0 series, because we use RPMs > a lot more frequently than we use tarballs and such. Are there any > plans to package and distribute a SRPM or spec file within the next few > days? I covered that in my release announcement -- it is up to the packager not me. > > Is any help needed for creating a 2.0 SPEC file for building RPMs with? > If work has not already started, I can surely hack one up and give it > to you guys - however, I'm not so sure if it would be up to Kern's > expectations :) I believe that the .spec file that is in the source code is perfectly fine with the exception of updating the version numbers of everything, ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
