On Oct 23, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 23 Oct 2006 at 18:57, Jason Dixon wrote:
>
>> *status dir
>> duncan-dir Version: 1.38.10 (08 June 2006) i686-redhat-linux-gnu
>> redhat
>> Daemon started 20-Oct-06 23:29, 7 Jobs run since started.
>>
>> Scheduled Jobs:
>> Level Type Pri Scheduled Name
>> Volume
>> =====================================================================
>> ===
>> ===========
>> Incremental Backup 10 22-Oct-06 20:00 Duncan-DailyINCR
>> SAT003
>> ====
>>
>> Running Jobs:
>> JobId Level Name Status
>> =====================================================================
>> =
>> 67 Full Duncan-DailyINCR.2006-10-21_20.00.00 is running
>> ====
>>
>> Terminated Jobs:
>> JobId Level Files Bytes Status Finished Name
>> =====================================================================
>> ===
>> 56 Full 86,715 26,069,033,291 OK 13-Oct-06 21:56
>> Duncan-WeeklyFULL
>> 57 Incr 6,078 5,172,709,640 OK 14-Oct-06 20:26
>> Duncan-DailyINCR
>> 58 Incr 143 101,542,750 OK 15-Oct-06 20:04
>> Duncan-DailyINCR
>> 59 Incr 77 101,003,021 OK 16-Oct-06 20:04
>> Duncan-DailyINCR
>> 60 Incr 77 101,022,473 OK 17-Oct-06 20:04
>> Duncan-DailyINCR
>> 61 Incr 69 101,039,725 OK 18-Oct-06 20:04
>> Duncan-DailyINCR
>> 62 Incr 77 101,063,367 OK 19-Oct-06 20:04
>> Duncan-DailyINCR
>> 63 Full 1 56,139,729 OK 19-Oct-06 23:14
>> BackupCatalog
>> 65 Full 0 0 Cancel 20-Oct-06 23:25
>> Duncan-WeeklyFULL
>> 66 Full 0 0 Cancel 21-Oct-06 07:09
>> Duncan-WeeklyFULL
>
> Are these the jobs you mean are just sitting there? That is normal.
> These are past jobs.
No, I was just pasting the entire output for completeness.
>> *status cl
>> Automatically selected Storage: DAT-72
>> Connecting to Storage daemon DAT-72 at duncan:9103
>>
>> duncan-sd Version: 1.38.10 (08 June 2006) i686-redhat-linux-gnu
>> redhat
>> Daemon started 06-Sep-06 16:51, 51 Jobs run since started.
>>
>> Running Jobs:
>> Writing: Full Backup job Duncan-WeeklyFULL JobId=64 Volume=""
>> pool="Default" device=""DAT-72" (/dev/nst0)"
>> Files=40,550 Bytes=23,350,083,659 Bytes/sec=252,681
>> FDReadSeqNo=677,824 in_msg=568004 out_msg=5 fd=5
>> Writing: Full Backup job Duncan-WeeklyFULL JobId=65 Volume=""
>> pool="Default" device=""DAT-72" (/dev/nst0)"
>> Files=0 Bytes=0 Bytes/sec=0
>> FDReadSeqNo=6 in_msg=6 out_msg=5 fd=7
>> Writing: Full Backup job Duncan-WeeklyFULL JobId=66 Volume=""
>> pool="Default" device=""DAT-72" (/dev/nst0)"
>> Files=0 Bytes=0 Bytes/sec=0
>> FDReadSeqNo=6 in_msg=6 out_msg=5 fd=9
>> Writing: Full Backup job Duncan-DailyINCR JobId=67 Volume=""
>> pool="Default" device=""DAT-72" (/dev/nst0)"
>> Files=0 Bytes=0 Bytes/sec=0
>> FDReadSeqNo=6 in_msg=6 out_msg=4 fd=11
>> ====
>
> It appears you are allowing mulitiple concurrent jobs. Is that your
> wish?
No. There is only one drive, and should only be one job at any time.
> Off hand, bouncing that FD will clear those mystery jobs.
It didn't. I restarted the bacula-fd service, they are still listed:
*status cl
Automatically selected Storage: DAT-72
Connecting to Storage daemon DAT-72 at duncan:9103
duncan-sd Version: 1.38.10 (08 June 2006) i686-redhat-linux-gnu redhat
Daemon started 06-Sep-06 16:51, 51 Jobs run since started.
Running Jobs:
Writing: Full Backup job Duncan-WeeklyFULL JobId=64 Volume=""
pool="Default" device=""DAT-72" (/dev/nst0)"
Files=40,550 Bytes=23,350,083,659 Bytes/sec=90,537
FDReadSeqNo=677,824 in_msg=568004 out_msg=5 fd=5
Writing: Full Backup job Duncan-WeeklyFULL JobId=65 Volume=""
pool="Default" device=""DAT-72" (/dev/nst0)"
Files=0 Bytes=0 Bytes/sec=0
FDReadSeqNo=6 in_msg=6 out_msg=5 fd=7
Writing: Full Backup job Duncan-WeeklyFULL JobId=66 Volume=""
pool="Default" device=""DAT-72" (/dev/nst0)"
Files=0 Bytes=0 Bytes/sec=0
FDReadSeqNo=6 in_msg=6 out_msg=5 fd=9
Writing: Full Backup job Duncan-DailyINCR JobId=67 Volume=""
pool="Default" device=""DAT-72" (/dev/nst0)"
Files=0 Bytes=0 Bytes/sec=0
FDReadSeqNo=6 in_msg=6 out_msg=4 fd=11
Writing: Full Backup job Duncan-DailyINCR JobId=68 Volume=""
pool="Default" device=""DAT-72" (/dev/nst0)"
Files=0 Bytes=0 Bytes/sec=0
FDReadSeqNo=6 in_msg=6 out_msg=4 fd=13
Thanks,
--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
