As part of my exercise to get Bacula 1.38 running with full GUI toys, I have installed SLES 10 on a computer, downloaded and installed the latest MysQL, downloaded Bacula 1.38.11 with the bacula-gui-bimagemgr, then downloaded and extracted the following:
atk 1.9.1 cairo 1.2.0 glib 2.12.2 gtk+ 2.10.4 jpeg 6b libpng 1.2.8 (configure version) pango 1.14.4 pkg-config 0.20 tiff 3.7.4 wxGTK 2.7.0-1 wxWidgets 2.7.0-1 I ran configure for all of the above and make|make install for those to which it applies, except for gtk+ and the wx items. My instructions say to do glib, gtk+ and wxGTK last, in that order. Also they say to configure gtk with this command line argument: -prefix=/opt/gtk As you know, configure, make and make install scroll a lot of text through the screen. I saw no errors until I tried it with gtk. At the end of make install, it informed me: checking for BASE_DEPENDENCIES... configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.12.0 atk >= 1.9.0 pango >= 1.12.0 cairo >= 1.2.0) were not met. Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively you may set the BASE_DEPENDENDENCIES_CFLAGS and BASE_DEPENDENCIES_LIBS environment variables to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. I looked at the man page and, while I understood some of what it said, it didn't help me solve my problem. So I ran ./configure > [package name].log to capture the stdout. I did not then try to capture stderr, and this printed to the console: ./configure > cairo.log cat: /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf: No such file or directory cat: /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf: No such file or directory cat: /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf: No such file or directory configure: WARNING: PDF backend will not be tested since poppler is not available configure: WARNING: SVG backend will not be tested since a librsvg is not available (Obviously, this is for cairo; others had similar errors with respect to "No such file . . .") So I began looking at the config.log files in each of the package directories. Most of them had an error of this sort (this one is from pkg-config): configure: failed program was: | #ifndef __cplusplus | choke me | #endif . . . configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h. */ | | #define PACKAGE_NAME "" | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "" | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "" | #define PACKAGE_STRING "" | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "" | #define PACKAGE_ "pkg-config" | #define VERSION "0.20" | /* end confdefs.h */ | #include <ac_nonexistent.h> Or (This one is from atk): configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h. */ | | #define PACKAGE_NAME "atk" | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "atk" | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "1.9.1" | #define PACKAGE_STRING "atk 1.9.1" | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=atk"; | #define PACKAGE_ "atk" | #define VERSION "1.9.1" | #define GETTEXT_PACKAGE "atk10" | /* end confdefs.h */ | #include <ac_nonexistent.h> So I deleted the package directories and extracted them again so I could run configure, make and make install from a clean slate, capturing both sdtout and stderr. Here are some examples of stderr output: glib make: gconvert.c:91: warning: â*visibilityâ* attribute ignored on non-class types ghash.c: In function â*IA__g_hash_table_refâ*: ghash.c:170: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of â*IA__g_atomic_int_addâ* differ in signedness tiff : dummy.c:9: warning: â*libport_dummy_functionâ* defined but not used tif_dir.c: In function â*_TIFFVSetFieldâ*: . . . ras2tiff.c:101: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules pango install: libtool: link: warning: `/usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.1.0/../../..//libfontconfig.la' seems to be moved The glib, pkg-config and tiff look like file corruption, so I downloaded and extracted them again, but got the same results. Are the others telling me that they are looking for libraries that are either not installed or that SLES has them in unconventional places where the scripts will not find them? If this is the case, is there a straightforward change that will let them be found? If not, could I expect all these items to install on RH without these errors? -- Tks n rgds, Richard White CNE6 Network Engineer Mason County, Washington 360-427-5501 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
