Hello,
I worked with Bacula spooling to see the effects on Sparc 280R machines (that continue to work very slow without spooling, almost 1000K/s).
I tried with different spooling dimensions (10Mb, 100Mb, 250Mb), the result was almost the same: during a single job backup, speed increased to almost 5000K/s.
BUT : at the end of the job, a final step of Bacula (kind of spool flushing) last a lot of minutes, and during this step, the medium transfer rate decreases.
The final result is then again a medium of 1000K/s...

How should I size the spooling dimensions? Is there any way of calculating the correct size?
What is that last step lowering the total rate?
May I assume that having 2-3 long jobs, this last step well have a little influence on the total rate?

Gabriele Bulfon - Sonicle S.r.l.
Tel +39 028246016 Int. 30 - Fax +39 028243880
Via Felice Cavallotti 16 - 20089, Rozzano - Milano - ITALY
http://www.sonicle.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to