Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > Hello, > I worked with Bacula spooling to see the effects on Sparc 280R > machines (that continue to work very slow without spooling, almost > 1000K/s). > I tried with different spooling dimensions (10Mb, 100Mb, 250Mb), the > result was almost the same: during a single job backup, speed > increased to almost 5000K/s. > BUT : at the end of the job, a final step of Bacula (kind of spool > flushing) last a lot of minutes, and during this step, the medium > transfer rate decreases. > The final result is then again a medium of 1000K/s... > > How should I size the spooling dimensions? Is there any way of > calculating the correct size? > What is that last step lowering the total rate? > May I assume that having 2-3 long jobs, this last step well have a > little influence on the total rate? > > > To me, that sounds kind of small for a spool file. I use 15 gig as the max for mine.
Maybe Kern or Arno have a better suggestion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
