On 7/14/06, Gabriele Bulfon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> I have some bacula installations on SunFire 280R Sparc machines, with Solaris 
> 10.
> These machines apperar to be very very slow with respect to other 
> installations
> (such as v20z) with same LTO2 device.
> As you can see from the report, 60Gb are copied in 9 hours, with an avarage 
> rate of > 1898.9 KB/s!
> On a v20z, the same amount of data is done in 5 hours or less, with an 
> avarage a
> rate of 3139.2 KB/s..

Hello Gabriele,
I put under work my LTO-based backup system on my Solaris 9 machine (a
fileserver running on old 220R!) and results are pretty good:

21-Jul 15:39 scribe02-dir: Bacula 1.38.9 (02May06): 21-Jul-2006 15:39:54
  JobId:                  261
  Job:                    DaisyProj.2006-07-21_14.59.44
  Backup Level:           Full
  Client:                 "daisy-fd" sparc-sun-solaris2.9,solaris,5.9
  FileSet:                "ExportProj" 2006-07-21 14:59:46
  Pool:                   "LTO2alt"
  Storage:                "Autoloader"
  Scheduled time:         21-Jul-2006 14:59:24
  Start time:             21-Jul-2006 14:59:47
  End time:               21-Jul-2006 15:39:54
  Elapsed time:           40 mins 7 secs
  Priority:               10
  FD Files Written:       253
  SD Files Written:       253
  FD Bytes Written:       25,391,596,871 (25.39 GB)
  SD Bytes Written:       25,391,628,721 (25.39 GB)
  Rate:                   10549.1 KB/s
  Software Compression:   None
  Volume name(s):         LTO2alt1
  Volume Session Id:      13
  Volume Session Time:    1153207122
  Last Volume Bytes:      25,410,464,200 (25.41 GB)
  Non-fatal FD errors:    0
  SD Errors:              0
  FD termination status:  OK
  SD termination status:  OK
  Termination:            Backup OK

The bacula-fd is version 1.38.9, compiled with gcc 3.3.2, hosted on a
Sun Enterprise 220R (2 US-II @450MHz) with Solaris 9. Server has two
arrays Sun D1000, so pretty old hardware. The sd is connected via
ordinary 100 MB/s network to the fd, and it's running on a Xeon-class
server with Linux/Debian.

That said, I would be surprised that your issue is with bacula
'slowness' on Solaris, so maybe the server is slow to access data from
disks or slow to send them?

Regards
-- 
Maxx

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to