Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup on Sparc SunFire 280R

[Gabriele Bulfon]

Oh no. I do not use compression at all.
And if I'd use compression, I'd use hardware one.

I don't think it's a problem of compression.
I have this problem only on sparc machines.
And they slow down the entire network backup during the night

Gabriele Bulfon - Sonicle S.r.l. Tel +39 028246016 Int. 30 - Fax +39 028243880 Via Felice Cavallotti 16 - 20089, Rozzano - Milano - ITALY http://www.sonicle.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Da: Hristo Benev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: Gabriele Bulfon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: MaxxAtWork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Data: 18 luglio 2006 15.16.37 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup on Sparc SunFire 280R

Do you use compression, because You have difference in processing power
Sparc III is much less powerful than Opteron?

On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 13:58 +0200, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Yes, it's a network backup. The SunFire is running the FD.
> The server is running on a v20z.
> This server backup many other machines, but no other one is running
> that slow.
> I usually achieve 5-8MB/s both on Windows clients and other solaris 10
> platforms (x86/amd).
> May it be that the compiled agent for SPARC has some problem?
>
>
> Gabriele Bulfon - Sonicle S.r.l.
> Tel +39 028246016 Int. 30 - Fax +39 028243880
> Via Felice Cavallotti 16 - 20089, Rozzano - Milano - ITALY
> http://www.sonicle.com
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> Da: MaxxAtWork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Data: 18 luglio 2006 13.22.13 CEST
> Oggetto: Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup on Sparc SunFire 280R
>
>
> On 7/14/06, Gabriele Bulfon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have some bacula installations on SunFire 280R Sparc
> machines, with Solaris 10.
> These machines apperar to be very very slow with
> respect to other installations (such as v20z) with
> same LTO2 device.
> As you can see from the report, 60Gb are copied in 9
> hours, with an avarage rate of 1898.9 KB/s!
> On a v20z, the same amount of data is done in 5 hours
> or less, with an avarage a rate of 3139.2 KB/s..
>
>
> Are you talking about local backups, i.e. both your bacula-fd
> and bacula-sd are running on the same server, or there is a
> network in between? In the latter case you might be hitting
> the network transfer limit.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Maxx
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users