On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:08:06PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > The simple answer concerning using the binary is: yes. I'm not opposed to > Bacula being used in commercial applications. However, if you do use it, and > you modify the GPL'ed code (not all of which is mine), which probably applies > to the binary as well, you are required to make the modifications publicly > available or you are in violation of the license. The idea (at least my I believe the GPL only requires that changes made to the source be available to people who use the modified binary. See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic for a clarification.
-Jason Martin -- The Microsoft Motto: "We're the leaders, wait for us!" This message is PGP/MIME signed.
pgpdEbiRaD7Qt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
