On Monday 17 April 2006 00:01, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Kern Sibbald writes:
> > 1. You want *all* data to be encrypted ...
> >
> >
> > 2. You want to control the encryption key(s) on a single machine (SD
> > encryption)...
>
> When the encryption on the SD is done, does that mean all the processing
> time will be spent on the SD side? couldn't that in theory create a burden
> on the SD machine?
Yes.
>
> So far, in the little time I have used Bacula, I like very much how
> friendly it is on resources. Compared to a few other methods I have tried
> recently (rsync, tar, unison).. I find Bacula is very friendly on
> resources yet faster than the other methods.
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
