Are there any known compatibility issues between latest Bacula source and Fedora Core 5, or MySQL 5 (that comes with FC5)?
Current .spec file seems to not know options fc5 or mysql5. Is it safe (according to today's knowledge) to use options fc4 and mysql4 while building rpms for Fedora Core 5? It seems to compile, and also to run nicely, but this necessarily isn't the whole truth... Btw, if no issues are known, might it be possible to include these options (with identical functionality compared to -4 options) into the .spec when next source rpm will be available? Just to reduce uncertainty while building. -- TiN ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
