On Saturday 08 April 2006 13:29, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> Are there any known compatibility issues between latest Bacula source and
> Fedora Core 5, or MySQL 5 (that comes with FC5)?
Yes, it is *highly* recommended that you apply the 1.38.7-mysql.patch that is
available in the Bacula "patches" section of Source Forge.
>
> Current .spec file seems to not know options fc5 or mysql5.
> Is it safe (according to today's knowledge) to use options fc4 and mysql4
> while building rpms for Fedora Core 5?
Yes, very likely.
> It seems to compile, and also to run
> nicely, but this necessarily isn't the whole truth...
Yes, the whole truth is that the requirements will be wrong, but assuming you
loaded a proper FC5 they will all be correctly covered.
>
> Btw,
> if no issues are known, might it be possible to include these options (with
> identical functionality compared to -4 options) into the .spec when next
> source rpm will be available? Just to reduce uncertainty while building.
FC5 will surely be added at some time in the near future. In any case, it
will get in within the next three months when I upgrade my development from
FC4 to FC5.
What would be nice is for some kind user to submit a patch ...
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
