On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm guessing: create two Storage resources, with different Media
Types, but both refer to the same device.
I thought about this some time ago and the only real conclusion I came to
was that it was easiest to only use higher capacity drives.
Did you find anything wrong with the approach I'm contemplating?
Not if you're using standalone drives.
How did you reach your conclusion?
We need to be able to operate in an autochanger environment. Varying
drive/tape capacities in the same robot seems to awkward to currently
handle inside bacula, especially when during the lifetime of a backup
procedure one would be likely to introduce steadily increasing tape
capacities.
AB
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
