Dave wrote:
> Hello,
> I was running some network backups and am getting some discrepancies.
> I was wondering if this was something to worry about. The backup server
> is a freebsd6 machine running bacula 1.38.5 via ports, the client in
> question is a windows xpsp2 box running bacula 1.38.5 also.
> The error came from a discrepancy from the client xp box. The backup
> terminated ok without warnings, yet the fd and sd bytes written values
> differ, should i be concerned? Again there were no warnings from either
> server or client.
>
> FD Files Written: 41,974
> SD Files Written: 41,974
> FD Bytes Written: 3,143,336,400
> SD Bytes Written: 3,150,666,604
> Rate: 432.4 KB/s
This is quite normal. The FD sent 3,143,336,400 bytes of files;
including file marks and other overhead, the SD actually wrote
3,150,666,604 bytes to tape.
> And those boxes are on the same subnet, is that a good transfer rate?
> Both boxes have 100 megabitt nics, full duplex, and a 100 megabitt switch.
I would consider that rather poor throughput across a 100FD network.
But, on the other hand, I don't know what your storage device is. It's
impossible to tell from that data alone where your bottleneck lies.
--
Phil Stracchino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Renaissance Man, Unix generalist, Perl hacker
Mobile: 603-216-7037 Landline: 603-886-3518
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
