Hello,
On 25.11.2005 22:00, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Ross Boylan wrote:
Item x: Deletion of Disk-Based Volumes
Date: Nov 25, 2005
Original: Ross Boylan <RossBoylan at stanfordalumni dot org>
Status: Proposal
What: It would be useful to control how long the actual backups were
kept for those backups that went to disk-based volumes. A range of
options similar to those currently available for retaining catalog
information would be useful. An additional option to permit deletion
of the actual backup when the record of the associated job and/or
files is purged from the catalog would also be useful. However, it
should be possible for the actual backups to be retained for more or
less time than the associated catalog records.
I suggest this could be accomplished with the addition of a single
optional Pool directive valid only for disk volumes:
Delete Volume When Pruned = Yes
I would even suggest that a python event on pruning should be used.
The python script would need to be called at the SD, obviously, and it
would need knowledge of the file that is purged.
Arno
--
IT-Service Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arno Lehmann http://www.its-lehmann.de
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
